Benjamin-Martyn Retail Strategy Consulting Sydney
Benjamin-Martyn Retail Strategy Consulting Sydney

Case Study · Independent Retail

Case Study · Independent Retail

Why a Structured Pricing Model Beat a Blanket Price Increase — by 4.7×

Why a Structured Pricing Model Beat a Blanket Price Increase — by 4.7×

Why a Structured Pricing Model Beat a Blanket Price Increase — by 4.7×

Why a structured pricing model delivered 4.7x more profit than a blanket price increase — and what most independent retailers get wrong about pricing.

Why a structured pricing model delivered 4.7x more profit than a blanket price increase — and what most independent retailers get wrong about pricing.

Why a structured pricing model delivered 4.7x more profit than a blanket price increase — and what most independent retailers get wrong about pricing.

4.7× More Profit

4.7× More Profit

4.7× More Profit

Than the blanket price increase the business had originally planned, achieved through category-based pricing architecture instead.

Than the blanket price increase the business had originally planned, achieved through category-based pricing architecture instead.

Than the blanket price increase the business had originally planned, achieved through category-based pricing architecture instead.

Client Type

Independent Retailer

Engagement Length

6 Weeks

Service

Pricing & Margin Optimisation

Result

4.7× More Profit

The Problem

Margins were shrinking despite strong sales

Margins were shrinking despite strong sales

Margins were shrinking despite strong sales

This retailer was selling well, but margins kept shrinking. Their instinct was to raise prices across the board to compensate — a 5% increase on everything, applied evenly.


The real issue wasn’t visible yet: pricing had never been structured by category. Some products were underpriced relative to demand, others were overpriced and losing sales, and heavy discounting habits were quietly eroding profit on the products that should have been most profitable.

The Approach

Category-based pricing instead of a blanket increase

Category-based pricing instead of a blanket increase

Category-based pricing instead of a blanket increase

Rather than raising every price by the same amount, we ran a full range margin audit — reviewing cost price, landed cost, and true margin by category, not just by product.


From there, we built a category-based pricing architecture: higher-demand categories absorbed a larger increase, price-sensitive categories stayed flat or moved slightly, and a clear markdown and clearance framework replaced the ad-hoc discounting that had been quietly cutting into profit.

The Result

4.7x more profit than the original plan

4.7x more profit than the original plan

4.7x more profit than the original plan

The category-based approach delivered 4.7 times more profit than the blanket 5% increase would have — without the customer pushback that an across-the-board price rise typically creates, since increases were concentrated where demand could support them.

4.7×

4.7×

4.7×

More Profit vs. Blanket Increase

More Profit vs. Blanket Increase

6

6

6

Weeks to Implement

Weeks to Implement

0

0

0

Customer Pushback Events

Customer Pushback Events

Retail strategy roadmap and commercial performance planning documents supporting independent retailer growth and profitability.

Selling well but margins still tight?

Selling well but margins still tight?

Selling well but margins still tight?

A short strategy call can show you where category-based pricing could outperform a blanket increase in your business.

A short strategy call can show you where category-based pricing could outperform a blanket increase in your business.

A short strategy call can show you where category-based pricing could outperform a blanket increase in your business.

BOOK A STRATEGY CALL

BOOK A STRATEGY CALL